Brussels, September 16, 2026: Spanish court ruling highlights cost of weak PSD2 enforcement

ETPPA welcomes a judgment by the Madrid Court of First Instance concerning ING’s PSD2 interface. The Court found that ING had used the standardised ‘ACSP’ transaction status inappropriately and negligently, ordering the bank to pay €101,213.37 plus interest and costs after 167 payments reported as accepted were subsequently rejected.

The ruling confirms that transaction-status information is not merely a technical detail. Payment Initiation Service Providers must be able to rely on accurate information from banks; otherwise, TPPs, merchants and consumers bear the consequences.

However, the fact that litigation was necessary highlights a wider enforcement gap. More than eight years after PSD2 became applicable, TPPs continue to face unreliable bank interfaces and slow supervisory responses across Europe.

ETPPA calls on the European Commission, the European Banking Authority and national supervisors to ensure consistent enforcement under PSD2 and the forthcoming PSR and PSD3. Legal access rights have little value unless breaches are investigated and remedied promptly.

Click here to read ETPPA's full statement.

The judgment was issued at first instance and may be appealed.